Sports Lighting Photometric Plans

Sports lighting is performance lighting. It must support play, safety, and visibility across the full surface.

A photometric plan is how you verify that performance before installation. It predicts foot-candle levels, uniformity, and where the weak areas will be.

This is useful for owners, architects, engineers, and contractors. It reduces fixture guesswork, helps with permitting, and prevents expensive changes after poles and wiring are installed.

In this guide, you will learn what a sports lighting photometric plan includes, how IES Classes (I, II, III) affect targets, and what to check for common sports facilities.

What a Sports Lighting Photometric Plan Includes

A sports lighting photometric plan is a performance document. It combines a layout drawing with calculated light levels so you can confirm brightness and consistency before purchase and installation.

Most plans include a foot-candle grid, pole locations, fixture quantities, mounting heights, and optics. Many also include summary metrics such as average, minimum, maximum, AVG/MIN, and MAX/MIN. These metrics help you judge uniformity and spot problem areas early.

sports lighting soccer field photometric plan stetra
Soccer field photometric plan showing calculated foot-candle levels, pole locations, and uniformity metrics.
sports lighting tennis court photometric plan stetra
Tennis court photometric plan illustrating foot-candle distribution, coverage consistency, and IES Class III lighting targets.

Do not judge a plan by average fc alone. A good average can hide dark pockets. Always check the minimum values and the uniformity ratios. These are the numbers that affect play quality and user complaints.

How Sports Lighting Photometric Plans Work in Practice

Sports lighting performance comes from geometry and optics. Pole height, setback, fixture aiming, and beam distribution control both coverage and glare. A photometric plan lets you test these variables and see the outcome before procurement.

Two projects can use the same wattage and still perform very differently. The difference is usually in optics (symmetric vs asymmetric), aiming angles, and how well the layout matches the playing surface shape.

  • Set targets: define the needed average, minimum, and uniformity based on the sport and level of play.
  • Select optics: choose distributions that match mounting height and field geometry.
  • Aim correctly: confirm the beams overlap evenly and avoid direct view angles.
  • Control spill: verify the light stays on the site and does not create off-site issues.

What to Verify Before You Approve the Plan

Use the plan to verify outcomes, not fixture count. Look for balanced distribution, strong minimum values and good uniformity. Then review aiming and spill control.

  • Minimum fc: confirm the darkest areas are still usable.
  • Uniformity: better AVG/MIN usually means fewer complaints and better playability.
  • Aiming: confirm fixtures are aimed into the task area, not into sight lines.
  • Maintenance factor: check LLF assumptions so targets hold over time.
sports lighting pickleball court aiming layout photometric plan stetra
Pickleball court photometric plan showing pole locations, fixture aiming, beam overlap, and resulting foot-candle distribution.
sports lighting outdoor basketball false color uniformity stetra
Outdoor Basketball court false-color photometric view used to identify hot spots and weak lighting areas.

Sports Lighting Types and IES Classes (I, II, III)

Sports lighting requirements vary by field size, player speed, viewing distance, and level of competition. The IES Class system is commonly used to define performance expectations and typical foot-candle targets.

The IES Class system is commonly used to define performance expectations for sports lighting. Class I applies to high-level competition and broadcast environments, while Class II supports organized leagues and competitive play. Class III is most often used for recreational and community facilities. The ranges below reflect typical planning targets and should always be verified with a photometric plan.

Football and Soccer Field Lighting

Football and soccer fields are large areas that rely on higher mounting heights and long-throw asymmetric optics. Uniform horizontal illuminance and consistent coverage across corners and sidelines are critical for safe play.

Typical planning targets:
IES Class III: ~30–50 fc
IES Class II: ~50–75 fc
IES Class I: 75+ fc

Uniformity ratios and spill control are as important as the average level, especially for community fields near residential areas.

Baseball and Softball Field Lighting

Baseball and softball fields require different lighting priorities for the infield and outfield. Vertical illuminance is critical for tracking the ball, especially for batters and fielders looking upward.

Typical planning targets:
Infield (Class III): ~40–60 fc
Outfield (Class III): ~20–30 fc
Class II / Class I: higher targets with added vertical illuminance requirements

Careful aiming and glare control are essential due to the directional nature of play and varied sight lines.

Tennis Court Lighting

Tennis is highly glare-sensitive. Players frequently look upward to track the ball, making optic control and aiming critical. Uniformity behind the baselines is often more important than peak light levels.

Typical planning targets:
IES Class III: ~30–50 fc
IES Class II: ~50–75 fc
IES Class I: 75+ fc

Good tennis lighting minimizes high-angle glare while maintaining even coverage across the full court width.

Basketball Courts (Indoor and Outdoor)

Indoor basketball lighting focuses on glare control, vertical illuminance, and smooth uniformity from ceiling-mounted fixtures. Outdoor courts must also address spill light and neighborhood impact.

Typical planning targets:
Indoor Class III: ~30–50 fc
Outdoor Class III: ~30–60 fc
Class II / Class I: higher levels depending on competition and viewing requirements

Optic selection and mounting height play a larger role than raw wattage in achieving good results.

Pickleball Court Lighting

Pickleball courts are compact but highly sensitive to glare. Lower mounting heights and close player proximity make fixture aiming and shielding critical.

Typical planning targets:
IES Class III: ~30–50 fc
IES Class II: ~50–70 fc

Consistent edge lighting and glare reduction often matter more than increasing overall brightness.

Ice Hockey Arenas and Natatoriums

Ice rinks and pool environments introduce reflective surfaces that increase glare and sparkle. Uniformity and careful fixture placement help control reflections and improve visibility.

Typical planning targets:
IES Class III: ~40–60 fc
IES Class II / Class I: higher targets depending on viewing and broadcast needs

False-color views and 3D renderings are especially valuable for evaluating these environments before installation.

Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Most sports lighting failures are predictable. They happen when the design is based on wattage, fixture count, or a single average number. A proper photometric plan makes the weak spots visible before installation.

  • Designing to average only: always verify minimum fc and uniformity ratios.
  • Wrong optics for height: the same fixture can perform well or fail based on distribution choice.
  • Poor aiming: small aiming errors create hot spots and dark pockets.
  • Ignoring glare: high-angle glare can ruin player comfort even when fc targets look fine.
  • Spill light not reviewed: off-site light can create compliance problems and complaints.

What a Permit-Ready Sports Lighting Report Should Deliver

A strong sports lighting report is easy to approve and easy to build. It clearly states the IES Class target, shows foot-candle grids, includes uniformity metrics, and provides visuals that non-technical stakeholders can understand. It also lists fixture types, mounting heights, and assumptions such as light loss factors.

This is also where the plan becomes a contractor tool. Clear pole positions, aiming intent, and fixture schedules reduce field questions and keep installation aligned with the design.

sports lighting natatorium false color performance stetra
False-color lighting visualization used to evaluate coverage and uniformity in a natatorium environment.

When you want confidence before purchase, a professional photometric plan is the fastest path. It aligns the owner, designer, and contractor on measurable performance.

Get a Professional Photometric Plan

We create accurate photometric plans ready for permitting, contractor installation, and real-world performance.

Key Takeaways

  • Sports lighting photometric plans verify foot-candles, uniformity, and coverage before installation.
  • IES Class I, II, and III help define performance level and expectations for the venue.
  • Always check minimum values and uniformity ratios, not only the average.
  • Optics and aiming often matter more than wattage for real-world results.
  • False-color and 3D views make hot spots, weak edges, and glare risks easier to spot.

If you want a sports lighting layout that performs the first time, use a verified photometric plan. Stetra Lighting can produce a permit-ready report with clear IES Class targets, calculations, and visuals you can hand directly to the contractor.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *